<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Spoof iPhone Memo Cost Apple $4 Billion; Gizmodo Forgives Engadget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/</link>
	<description>Portable Media Player Daily News.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Piko</title>
		<link>http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Piko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/#comment-969</guid>
		<description>&#62; Engadget was simply reporting what they thought was true

They should have taken a moment to VERIFY that the email was real, instead of RUSHING to publish what turned out to be a 4 BILLION short term loss. I hate to think of all the people whose stop-loss sell orders were engaged. This is tantamount to fraud and brings in to serious question the validity and reliability of new sites such as Engadget and their ilk.

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Engadget was simply reporting what they thought was true</p>
<p>They should have taken a moment to VERIFY that the email was real, instead of RUSHING to publish what turned out to be a 4 BILLION short term loss. I hate to think of all the people whose stop-loss sell orders were engaged. This is tantamount to fraud and brings in to serious question the validity and reliability of new sites such as Engadget and their ilk.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Matters &#124; In Response of Fake Email Spoof, Gizmodo Backs Engadget</title>
		<link>http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Matters &#124; In Response of Fake Email Spoof, Gizmodo Backs Engadget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/#comment-965</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] to sit back and relish the bad press their chief rival is getting. But that is the complete opposite thing that happened.  People have asked me if I’m gleeful. Hell no. Giz and Engaga are in the same boat. This sort of [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] to sit back and relish the bad press their chief rival is getting. But that is the complete opposite thing that happened.  People have asked me if I’m gleeful. Hell no. Giz and Engaga are in the same boat. This sort of [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/05/17/spoof-iphone-memo-cost-apple-4-billion-gizmodo-forgives-engadget/#comment-963</guid>
		<description>Engadget was simply reporting what they thought was true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engadget was simply reporting what they thought was true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
